Who legally owns the vault — and why that question matters more than the multisig.
The default vehicle is a revocable living trust. David
creates it. David can amend it or tear it up while he's alive. The
trust — not David personally — is the legal owner of the bitcoin.
When David dies, his successor trustees step in by the terms of the
document, and the assets never enter probate court.
That last sentence is the entire point. Probate is public, slow, and
expensive. A trust skips it. Sarah and Marcus take over with the
authority already on file, instead of a judge appointing a personal
representative six months later.
The companion documents on David's folio do the work the trust
alone can't:
- Pour-over will. Catches anything David forgot to retitle into the trust.
- Children's sub-trust. Holds the kids' portion until they're old enough to custody it.
- Durable power of attorney + HIPAA. For the months before death, not the moment of it.
- Engagement letter. Marcus's job description, written down.
Two pieces specific to Bitcoin that most boilerplate trusts miss:
- RUFADAA language. The Revised Uniform Fiduciary
Access to Digital Assets Act is on the books in almost every US
state. It governs whether a trustee has legal standing to touch
a digital asset. The trust must explicitly authorize
access to "digital assets, cryptographic keys, wallets, and
seed phrases" — boilerplate trust language often doesn't, and
without it Sarah and Marcus arrive at the gate without standing.
- Governing state. Trust law is state law. Some
states have built better frameworks for digital-asset trusts —
Wyoming, South Dakota, New Hampshire, Florida, Texas, Nevada
among them. Choice of state affects taxes, trustee liability,
and how the digital-asset statute reads. Pick deliberately.